Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Acta ortop. mex ; 28(5): 273-276, sep.-oct. 2014. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-740969

ABSTRACT

El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar los resultados de la artrodesis cervical mediante fusión intersomática con hueso autólogo y/o espaciador intersomático en discopatía cervical. Material y métodos: Estudio comparativo transversal en 49 pacientes tratados quirúrgicamente con artrodesis anterior, en el período Enero 2011 a Diciembre 2011; revisión del expediente clínico. Resultados: Incluimos 49 pacientes de los cuales 20 (40.8%) fueron hombres y 29 (59.2%) mujeres; el diagnóstico en todos fue patología discal (hernia cervical) con uno o dos niveles de afectación; el tiempo quirúrgico promedio fue 69.12, mínimo 53 - máximo 110, ± 19.61 minutos para artrodesis cervical con injerto y promedio 61.18, mínimo 50 - máximo 96.00, ± 11.38 minutos para artrodesis cervical con espaciador intersomático (p = 0.00 t de Student); las características sociodemográficas, clínicas y complicaciones se muestran. Los pacientes operados con ambas técnicas tuvieron una adecuada integración radiológica, p = 0.015 consideramos estadísticamente significativa una p ≤ a 0.05, χ². Conclusiones: La integración ósea es buena tanto con la aplicación de caja intersomática como con la aplicación de injerto autólogo de cresta iliaca, en pacientes con patología discal cervical.


The purpose of this study was to compare the results of cervical arthrodesis performed through interbody fusion with autologous bone and/or interbody spacer for cervical disc disease. Material and methods: Comparative cross-sectional study that included 49 patients who underwent surgery for anterior arthrodesis between January and December 2011, whose clinical records were reviewed. Results: We included 49 patients: 20 (40.8%) males and 29 (59.2%) females. All of them were diagnosed with disc disease (cervical disc herniation) involving one or two levels. Mean operative time was 69.12, with a minimum of 53 and a maximum of 110 ± 19.61 minutes for cervical arthrodesis with a graft. Mean operative time was 61.18 with a minimum of 50 and a maximum of 96.00 ± 11.38 minutes for cervical arthrodesis with an interbody spacer (p = 0.00, Student t test). Patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and complications are shown. Patients in whom both surgical techniques were used had appropriate radiological integration, with p = 0.015, considering p ≤ a 0.05 as significant, χ2. Conclusions: In patients with cervical disc disease bone integration is appropriate with the use of either an interbody cage or an autologous iliac crest graft.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Bone Transplantation , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery , Spinal Fusion/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL